Public Discourse
Training Data: Exploiting Artists
AI art generators like DALLE-E and Stable Diffusion are trained on millions of images pulled from the interest. Many of those images are works by real artists who never gave permission.
The Concern
- Artists argue that using their art without consent is exploitation.
- AI models imitate distinct styles, making it hard to tell human-made from machine-made work.
Real-Word Case
-
Getty Images v. Stability AI (2023-Present)
Getty sued for unauthorized use of copyright images to train Stable Diffusion. The court is weighing whether millions of creators can be represented in a single action. The case spotlights the lack of transparency in AI datasets.
Compensation and Consent
Even when artists do contribute to AI training, like with Adobe Stock, payment isn't always fair or consistent.
Example: Adobe Firefly
- Contributions were given a discretionary bonus (September 2024).
- No guarantee of future payments.
- Artists must agree to AI training or they lose access to posting to Adobe Stock.
Ethical Dilemma
Should artists have to choose between making money and protecting their work?
Copyright & Ownership
Example: Théâtre D'opéra Spatial
- Created using Midjourney and Photoshop
- Rejected for copyright because it lacked enough human authorship.
- Reinforced the need for a human creator to claim legal rights.
Implications
- Raises questions about who “owns” AI art.
- Makes it difficult for AI creators to protect or sell their work.
Artist Backlash & Protests
Many artist communities have responded with strong resistance:
- ArtStation faced protests after allowing AI art without opt-out options.
- DeviantArt launched an AI tool but failed to clearly protect artists’ rights.
- Thousands signed petitions demanding ethical AI training practices.
Creative Jobs Under Threat
AI art is fast, cheap, and good enough to replace some design work, putting creative jobs at risk.
- WGA & SAG-AFTRA Strikes (2023): Writers and actors protested AI replacing their work. The strikes spraked global conversations about labor protections in the age of generative AI.